Why this dispatch exists
Third per-archetype RFP template covering Archetype C: hybrid prop firm plus broker operators per the hybrid archetype dispatch.
Section 1: Requirement overview
The requirement is the dual-vertical broker tech stack for an operator running two legally distinct entities: a regulated CFD broker (typically CySEC, DMCC, or both) plus an education-positioned prop firm vertical under common ownership.
Section 2: Vendor evaluation categories required
- Brokerage hosting (single deployment with logical separation between prop firm and broker MT5 instances)
- Trading platforms (shared MT5 with broker-ID separation; separate prop firm tech vendors for challenge management + payout + simulated execution)
- LP procurement (broker side only; prop firm side simulated execution)
- Risk management (specialist with broker-ID-level segmentation as critical procurement requirement)
- KYC + AML (two distinct flows: lightweight prop firm KYC + full broker KYC; two-vendor pattern recommended)
- RegTech (Eventus Validus for combined CFD + proactive prop firm surveillance; Cappitech for broker-side MiFIR; Behavox or Smarsh for both entities)
- Broker CRM (multi-tenant configuration Pattern 3 from broker CRM deep dive: one tenant per entity with shared parent visibility)
- Prop firm tech (specialist vendors for challenge management + payout + simulated execution)
- IB management (four-stage attribution capability required: challenge purchase → challenge pass → broker FTD → ongoing broker revenue)
- Broker analytics (broker side only)
- Copy trading (broker side only; cTrader Copy or Brokeree Social Trader)
- Payments (two distinct PSP stacks for prop firm + broker)
Section 3: Universal vendor requirements
Apply the five universal dimensions from the RFP scoring framework opener.
Section 4: Per-pillar requirements
Per-pillar requirements with hybrid-specific emphasis:
- Risk management: broker-ID-level segmentation demonstrated on operator’s specific MT5 instance configuration before signature (broker-IDs 1-100 prop firm vs 101-500 broker with separate VaR limits + separate pre-trade controls per group)
- Broker CRM: multi-tenant Pattern 3 with parent organisation visibility
- IB management: four-stage attribution test on operator’s specific test client introduction sequence (challenge purchase → challenge pass → 90-day broker FTD → 12-month ongoing broker revenue tracking)
- KYC: two-vendor approach OR one-vendor-with-two-configurations approach (Pattern 1 vs Pattern 2 architectural decision per broker CRM deep dive)
- Prop firm tech: forward-compatible architecture for 2026-2028 regulatory environment (FCA consultation, CySEC enforcement, DMCC framework, ASIC + US CFTC parallel activity)
Section 5: Hybrid archetype customisation (weight multipliers)
Per the Phase 4 opener customisation layer:
- IB3 (four-stage hybrid attribution) x 2.0
- R6 (broker-ID segmentation) x 2.0
- CRM1 (multi-tenant) x 1.5
- PF1-5 (prop firm tech) x 1.5
Section 6: Disqualification thresholds checklist
Vendor automatic disqualification if score below 2:
- ☐ Broker-ID-level segmentation for risk management vendor
- ☐ Four-stage attribution capability for IB management vendor
- ☐ Multi-tenant Pattern 3 for CRM vendor
- ☐ Forward-compatible regulatory architecture for prop firm tech vendor
- ☐ Match-Trade Crypto / ETNA Software / FXJunction automatic disqualifications carry through
Section 7: Vendor scoring rubric reference
Hybrid-specific demo emphasis:
- Broker-ID segmentation demonstration on operator’s MT5 (concrete demonstration before signature)
- Four-stage attribution demonstration on operator’s specific test client introduction sequence
- Multi-tenant CRM demonstration with parent organisation visibility
Section 8: Reference customer validation
Required hybrid operator reference customers:
- Risk management: minimum 2 hybrid operators with broker-ID segmentation deployment
- IB management: minimum 2 hybrid operators with four-stage attribution deployment + 12-month-plus tenure
- CRM: minimum 2 hybrid operators with multi-tenant Pattern 3 deployment
- Prop firm tech: minimum 2 hybrid operators with simulated execution layer operational tenure
Section 9: Integration testing scope
Hybrid-specific integration testing:
- Broker-ID segmentation end-to-end testing on operator’s specific MT5 instance configuration
- Four-stage attribution end-to-end testing on operator’s specific test client introduction sequence
- Multi-tenant CRM testing with cross-entity workflow validation
- Prop firm tech simulated execution layer testing under fast-market scenarios
Section 10: Decision documentation references
Hybrid-specific documentation:
- Two-architecture procurement pattern rationale (broker-side turnkey or unbundled + separately procured prop firm vendors)
- Legal entity separation framework documentation
- Multi-tenant CRM pattern selection rationale (Pattern 1 vs 2 vs 3)
- KYC architecture decision rationale (two-vendor vs one-vendor-two-configurations)