scorecard
AU10TIX
Atlas score
3.5
Best for
- High-volume CIFs needing enterprise-grade forensic document analysis
- Operators already in Microsoft Entra or enterprise identity infrastructure
- CySEC CIFs with dedicated procurement and legal teams for vendor onboarding
Not for
- Startup or mid-market CIFs targeting a sub-three-month KYC deployment
- Brokers with active IB networks requiring documented KYB workflows
- Operators needing transparent per-check pricing for TCO modelling
Pros
- Forensic document analysis heritage trained on decades of authentic and fraudulent samples gives a depth edge over OCR-led competitors.
- Document coverage spans 5,000-plus types across 240-plus countries, covering the full retail acquisition geography of most CySEC CIFs.
- Built-in FATF, EU AMLD, and FinCEN-aligned sanctions and PEP screening included in the core platform.
- ISO/IEC 30107-3 certified liveness detection and ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 Type II, and GDPR compliance certifications documented.
- Microsoft Entra Verified ID premier issuer status positions the platform for EU AMLR digital identity wallet compliance ahead of July 2027.
- Consortium fraud intelligence across the AU10TIX customer network adds a signal layer above standard document-and-biometric verification.
Cons
- All pricing is enterprise-quoted with no disclosed per-check rate; TCO modelling requires a vendor quote before RFP comparison is possible.
- No CySEC-specific vertical page, no named Cyprus broker customer, and no Limassol office in current public materials.
- KYB workflow depth is not documented - a gap for brokers onboarding IB networks, white-label partners, or corporate account holders.
- No public partner or referral program; channel access runs through direct BD, creating friction for compliance consultants in the Cyprus ecosystem.
- Sales-led procurement cycle of weeks rather than days is incompatible with sub-three-month CySEC go-live timelines.
Pricing teardown
Pricing not publicly disclosed — contact vendor for a quote.
Public pricing not disclosed; see body for details.
Editorial commentary
Who They Are
AU10TIX was founded in 2002 - making it one of the longest-tenured identity verification companies in this review set by a decade or more. Headquartered in Amsterdam with operations in New York, London, Singapore, and Hod Hasharon (Israel), it sits firmly in the enterprise IDV category. AU10TIX is a pure-play identity verification platform, not a fraud suite that bolted on KYC later. Its heritage is forensic document analysis - physical and digital document examination at scale - which informs its technical differentiation against newer entrants. The broker problem it targets is high-volume, high-stakes onboarding at platforms that cannot afford both false rejections (revenue loss) and false approvals (regulatory exposure). Notable named customers in vendor materials include Walmart, TikTok, Booking.com, Coinbase, Payoneer, and Interactive Brokers. The Interactive Brokers relationship is particularly relevant to this chapter: IBKR publicly references AU10TIX as a fallback verifier within its own onboarding stack, which provides a proxy signal for its suitability in regulated financial services contexts.
What You Actually Get
AU10TIX covers the core trilogy required by CySEC-regulated onboarding workflows: document verification, biometric liveness, and AML/sanctions screening. Document coverage spans 5,000 or more document types across 240-plus countries. The forensic document analysis layer - which the vendor describes as using computer vision trained on decades of authentic and fraudulent document samples - is the platform’s stated differentiator against automated OCR-led approaches.
On the AML side, the platform includes built-in sanctions screening aligned to FATF, EU AMLD, and FinCEN frameworks. PEP database checks and adverse media are available as part of the integrated stack. The biometric face match and liveness detection carries an ISO/IEC 30107-3 certification for presentation attack detection.
Two more recent capability additions are notable: AU10TIX became a premier issuer for Microsoft Entra Verified ID in 2025, positioning it within the emerging EU digital identity wallet infrastructure ahead of the EU AMLR July 2027 transition. Sequential fraud detection using consortium intelligence (shared signal across AU10TIX’s customer network) adds a fraud-deterrence layer that sits above standard AML screening. KYB depth is not a documented strength in current vendor materials - this is a gap for brokers with active IB networks or B2B partner onboarding needs.
Pricing Reality
All pricing is enterprise-quoted with no publicly disclosed per-check rate or monthly minimum. AU10TIX positions itself at the premium tier against the SMB-friendly anchors in this pillar: there is no equivalent to Sumsub’s $1.85/check Compliance tier or ShuftiPro’s $0.20/check pay-as-you-go option. Procurement is sales-led, which means contract timelines of weeks rather than days and commercial terms that are not RFP-comparable without direct engagement.
For brokers modelling TCO, the absence of disclosed pricing makes AU10TIX structurally unsuitable for the pillar TCO calculator without a vendor quote first. The enterprise commitment structure also implies volume minimums that are not publicly specified - an important pressure-test item for any CIF evaluating this vendor.
CySEC + AML Fit
AU10TIX’s regulatory alignment covers EU AMLD and FATF guidance at the framework level, and is categorised as CySEC-acceptable in our research. That said, CySEC-specific positioning is absent from current vendor materials - there is no dedicated Cyprus vertical page, no named CySEC customers in public material, and no disclosed local presence in Limassol.
For the CySEC August 2025 sanctions regime, the built-in FATF/EU AMLD-aligned sanctions screening is the relevant capability, but the depth and update cadence of the underlying sanctions database is not publicly benchmarked against pure-play AML specialists such as ComplyAdvantage. Ongoing monitoring capability is referenced in the feature set. Broker-specific workflows - source-of-funds documentation, POA verification cadence, MLRO escalation paths - are not addressed in public vendor documentation. The GDPR-compliant data handling certification, ISO/IEC 27001, and SOC 2 Type II provide the baseline assurance framework expected by CySEC supervised entities. The Microsoft Entra Verified ID issuer status positions AU10TIX ahead of most peers for the EU AMLR reusable digital identity layer, though that transition timeline extends to July 2027.
Partner Program Reality
No public referral or affiliate program with disclosed commission structure is documented. AU10TIX has a visible technology partnership with Microsoft (Entra Verified ID), but this does not constitute a channel program accessible to compliance consultants, IBs, or integration partners. For operators evaluating AU10TIX through a compliance advisor or broker infrastructure provider, the engagement path runs through direct BD. The absence of a published partner program is a friction signal for the Cyprus broker ecosystem, where Sumsub’s three-tier public program sets a high bar for channel accessibility.
Where This Vendor Breaks Down
The structural mismatch for most CySEC-regulated brokers in the mid-market segment is procurement weight. AU10TIX was built for enterprise procurement cycles - the process of getting to a comparable quote will take longer, require more legal review, and carry higher minimum commitments than vendors with self-serve or transparent pricing.
The gap in forex-specific positioning matters for due diligence: CySEC inspectors evaluating a broker’s vendor selection process will look for evidence that the vendor was selected with an understanding of the regulated context. Vendors with an explicit CySEC or EU 6AMLD vertical page provide that paper trail more cleanly.
KYB coverage is a material gap. Brokers onboarding introducing brokers, white-label partners, or institutional clients under their CySEC CIF authorization need KYB workflows - business registry checks, UBO discovery, sanctions screening on legal entities. AU10TIX’s documented capabilities are KYC-centric. Pairing AU10TIX with a dedicated KYB layer adds integration complexity and cost that should appear in any RFP budget model. Finally, the absence of any named CySEC customer in current public material means the Cyprus-specific reference check runs dry - an RFP should request a regulated EU financial-services reference as a minimum.
See the full KYC/AML vendor comparison and the CySEC AML 2026 timeline for context on where AU10TIX sits in the competitive field.