scorecard
Trustly
Atlas score
3.5
Best for
- Brokers serving Nordic, DACH, Benelux, or UK retail trading clients with high bank-transfer deposit preference
- CySEC and FCA-regulated operators adding a bank-transfer channel to reduce card-processing MCC 6211 cost exposure
- Operators with Brazilian client books needing PIX coverage alongside European bank-transfer rails
Not for
- Brokers whose primary client base is in APAC, MENA, or LATAM outside Brazil
- Operators needing Trustly as a sole primary PSP without a parallel card acquirer
Pros
- Finansinspektionen-authorised (Sweden) and FCA-authorised (UK, Firm Reference 1005703): the pay-by-bank vendor with the most credible EU and UK regulatory anchors in this review set.
- No MCC 6211 card-scheme exposure on bank-transfer transactions: Trustly deposits bypass Visa and Mastercard rails entirely, eliminating the high-risk classification cost and approval-rate problem central to broker card processing.
- 33+ market coverage with 275 million annual transactions and $10 billion in payment volume: the most established pay-by-bank network for European broker use cases reviewed here.
- SOC 2, ISO 27001, and TUV Saarland certifications publicly stated; PCI DSS card-data compliance is not applicable given bank-transfer-only architecture, removing a common compliance overhead.
- Brazil (PIX) coverage extends the platform's reach into the most active LATAM market, adding value for brokers with Brazilian client books beyond the core European footprint.
Cons
- Geographic concentration in Europe: APAC, MENA, and non-Brazil LATAM corridors are not covered, requiring separate PSP layers for operators with trader bases outside the European footprint.
- Settlement currency options are not publicly confirmed; operators requiring non-EUR, non-GBP settlement need to verify available currencies during onboarding.
- Pricing is not published; pay-by-bank rates are structurally below card interchange but actual Trustly fees require full commercial engagement before cost modelling is possible.
- Open-banking infrastructure quality is inconsistent across Southern European markets; headline 98% conversion rate claims may not hold in markets with unreliable bank APIs.
Pricing teardown
Pricing not publicly disclosed — contact vendor for a quote.
Public pricing not disclosed; see body for details.
Editorial commentary
Who They Are
Trustly is a Swedish authorised payment institution founded in 2008 and headquartered in Stockholm, operating the leading pay-by-bank rail in Europe. The company processes over 275 million transactions annually and, according to vendor materials, moves approximately $10 billion in annual payment volume. Trustly is not a card acquirer or e-wallet: it enables direct account-to-account bank transfers initiated from a merchant’s checkout, bypassing card networks entirely. In the broker payments chapter, Trustly occupies the pay-by-bank slot - a meaningful alternative deposit channel for European broker client bases in markets where online banking authentication is high (Nordics, Germany, Netherlands, UK). The company holds authorisation from Sweden’s Finansinspektionen, FCA authorisation in the UK (Firm Reference: 1005703), and operates UK-regulated entities including Ecospend Technologies Limited and SlimPay SA (ACPR-supervised in France).
What Is Actually in the Package
Trustly publicly references coverage across 33+ markets, with documented European presence in Sweden, Finland, Norway, Denmark, UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia, plus North America (US and Canada) and Brazil. Payment flow works via open-banking authentication: the trader selects pay-by-bank at the broker cashier, is redirected or presented with an iFrame, authenticates with their bank app or eID, and funds transfer directly from the client’s bank account to the broker’s merchant account. The vendor claims conversion rates of up to 98% and checkout speeds 2x faster than conventional methods. Integration options include direct JSON-RPC API with full customisation, sandbox access, and dedicated technical support, as well as near-instant activation via PSP partner routes. Settlement currency specifics are not publicly published; operators should confirm the available settlement currencies during onboarding. Chargeback handling in the traditional sense does not apply to bank-transfer transactions, as authorised bank pushes are not reversible through card-scheme dispute mechanisms. ISO 27001 certification, TUV Saarland accreditation, SOC 2 compliance, and GDPR adherence are publicly stated.
Pricing Reality
Trustly does not publish pricing. Pay-by-bank processors in this segment typically price on a per-transaction flat fee or a capped percentage, significantly below card interchange rates. The absence of card-scheme fees (Visa/Mastercard interchange, assessment, and scheme fees) makes pay-by-bank structurally cheaper than card processing for the same deposit value. However, actual Trustly rates are negotiated per merchant, and volume commitments are typically required to access competitive rates. Setup and integration fees are not published. Operators evaluating Trustly should model the cost differential against their current card processing rate stack, accounting for the fact that pay-by-bank typically serves a different trader segment (bank-transfer-preference clients) rather than directly substituting card volume.
Jurisdictional and Regulatory Fit
Trustly’s FCA and Finansinspektionen authorisations make it a credible option for FCA and CySEC-regulated brokers operating European-facing businesses. The absence of MCC 6211 card-scheme exposure is a structural advantage: because pay-by-bank bypasses Visa and Mastercard rails, FX/CFD operators do not face the high-risk MCC classification problem on Trustly transactions. This eliminates one of the primary cost and availability pain points in broker card processing. Brazil coverage extends the platform’s reach into LATAM for operators with Brazilian client books. US and Canada coverage is publicly referenced but broker-specific regulatory fit in North American jurisdictions requires operator-level verification. PCI DSS certification is not relevant to bank-transfer-only processors in the same way as card data environments; Trustly’s published compliance framework is SOC 2 and ISO 27001 rather than PCI DSS.
Where It Fits in a Multi-PSP Stack
In a typical three-to-five PSP broker stack, Trustly fills the European bank-transfer slot. It is not a replacement for a card acquirer, and it does not serve Asian or MENA local-rail needs. The strategic value is concentrated in Nordic, DACH, Benelux, and UK markets where bank-transfer deposit preference is high among retail trading clients and where card-processing approval rates and MCC 6211 surcharges make card-first strategies expensive. A broker running Trustly alongside a primary card processor, an e-wallet (Skrill/NETELLER), and a regional specialist covers the core European deposit mix. Trustly is better suited as a secondary or parallel channel than as a sole primary PSP, because it cannot serve traders who prefer card or e-wallet funding.
Where This Breaks Down
Trustly’s geographic footprint is strongest in Europe and weakest everywhere else. Brokers with significant APAC, MENA, or non-Brazil LATAM client bases will find no direct coverage from Trustly for those corridors. The vendor does not publish pricing, which makes pre-sales budgeting difficult. Settlement currency options are unconfirmed publicly, which is a gap for operators requiring non-EUR, non-GBP settlement. Trustly’s market reach in the US is referenced but the FX/CFD broker use case there requires separate verification given US regulatory constraints on online trading. The pay-by-bank model depends on open-banking infrastructure quality in each market: in markets where bank APIs are inconsistent or outage-prone (common in some Southern European markets), approval rates may fall below the vendor’s headline claims.